• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Image Search for HS Classification by TaichiKawazoe

  • General
  • HS Classification
  • Origin Verification
  • Japanese
  • Contact form
  • About the author
*HS classification can be easier with ImageSearch on world customs ruling database
The method is described in "ImageSearch for HS classification"

What is “Focused value method”?

2019-10-07 By Taichi Kawazoe

Focused Value Method is to calculate the Regional Value Content(RVC)
Based on the Value of Specified Non-Originating Materials.

Case study of “Focused value method” e.g.” wiring harness”

A company in TPP Party A manufactures engine wiring harness (subheading 8544.30)
from the following materials:

  • Non-originating copper wire (subheading 7413.00) imported from country B;
  • Originating plastic ties (subheading 3926.90) imported from country C;
  • Non-originating plastic tape (subheading 3926.90) imported from country D;
  • Non-originating connectors (subheading 7326.90) imported from country E.

The unit price of a single harness is priced as:

What is "Focused value method"?

Using the provision in Article 3.5 of the TPP Agreement on how to calculate the
regional value content (RVC), different methods can be used to determine if the
harness is originating.

The PSR for goods of subheading 8544.30 is:
A change to a good of subheading 8544.30 from any other subheading except
from heading 74.08, 74.13, 76.05, 76.14 or subheading 8544.11 through
8544.20 or 8544.42 through 8544.60; or
regional value content of not less than:
a. 35% under the build-up method
b. 45% under the build-down method
c. 60% under the focused value method taking into account only the
nonoriginating
materials of heading 74.08, 74.13, 76.05, 76.14 and
subheading
8544.11 through 8544.60.

Since subheading 7413.00 is subject to the exception in PSR 8544.30, “Non-originating
copper wire (subheading 7413.00) imported from country B;” is the material that
does not satisfy CTC rule.

Therefore subject to “Focused value method” is only this “copper wire”

RVC = Value of the Good – FVNM / Value of the Good x 100
In this case, RVC= (380-115) / 380 x100 = 69.73%

The threshold for FVNM is 60% so the harness will be considered to be originating.
It is important to note that all the other non-originating materials of subheadings not
mentioned in the specific PSR are disregarded when using the FVNM for
calculating the RVC.

Case study of “Focused value method” e.g.” wired glass sheets”

A manufacturer in a Party to CPTPP makes wired glass sheets classified to
7005.30, from cast glass of 7003.10 and steel wire of 7217 that are imported
from Brazil (a non-party).
The wired glass sheets are sold to an Australian importer for the equivalent
of AUD200 each (excluding international shipment costs).

The imported cast glass costs the manufacturer the equivalent of AUD18/kg,
with each sheet of wired glass using five kilos of cast glass.
Cost of originating materials and production processes are AUD40 per sheet.
Annex 3-D to Chapter 3 of CPTPP identifies that the ‘focused value’ PSR for
cast glass of 7003.10 is:

50 per cent under the focused value method taking into account only
the non-originating materials of heading 70.03 through 70.05

RVC = Value of the Good – FVNM / Value of the Good x 100
In this case, RVC= (200-5kg x 18) / 200 x100 = 55%

Despite the wire also being non-originating, only the non-originating cast glass is
taken into account under the focused value method.
Therefore, the RVC for the wired glass sheets is 55 per cent and they are
therefore considered TransPacific Partnership originating goods.

HS classification can be easier with ImageSearch on world customs ruling database
The method is in this Kindle book


By country
US|UK|DE|FR|ES|IT|JP|CA|AU|NL

No related posts.

Filed Under: General

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Wooden Table with metal frame
  • Laser speed meter
  • Pillowcase with gel
  • Cosmetic set
  • Sponge

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • September 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • December 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019

    Categories

    • Case Study
    • Classification Example
    • complex
    • Court case
    • General
    • GRI
    • HS Classification
    • Link
    • Movie
    • Origin Verification
    • Photo
    • Tariff engineering
    • 未分類

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2025 HS Classification by Precedent