• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Image Search for HS Classification by TaichiKawazoe

  • General
  • HS Classification
  • Origin Verification
  • Japanese
  • Contact form
  • About the author

Archives for November 2019

Case study of Value Added method(VA) e.g.”Table lamps”

2019-11-29 By Taichi Kawazoe

Here is a case study of Value Added method.

Company A manufactures Table lamps (HS SubHeading 9405.20)

Table lamps of SubHeading 9405.20 are manufactured from the following
non-originating materials:

Tubes of brass € 3.00
Plates of brass € 2.00
Switch € 1.00
Cable: € 0.30
Contact € 0.20
Steel wire € 0.15
Plastics components € 0.25
Textile fabrics €1.20
Light bulb € 0.30
Lamp holder: € 0.50
Screws €0.05
Varnish: € 0.03
Various materials €0.40
Total value € 9.38

 

The lamps are sold at an ex-works price of € 20.-

 

The list rule for heading 94.05 requires the following working or processing to
be carried out on non-originating material:

“Manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 50 %
of the ex-works price of the product”.

The total value of the non-originating materials used in the manufacture of one
lamp (€ 9.38) is less than 50 % of the ex-works price of one lamp (€ 20.-).

The origin requirements are fulfilled and the lamps can be regarded as
originating products.

Filed Under: Case Study

Case study of Value Added method(VA) e.g.”Plastic Boxes”

2019-11-25 By Taichi Kawazoe

Here is a case study of Value Added method.

Company A manufactures Plastic Boxes (HS heading 3923)

from Non-originating granules of plastics (heading 3901).

Non-originating granules of plastics are imported from country B where
is not a  Party of the FTA;

 

The unit price of a single Plastic Boxes is priced as:
Ex-works price of the boxes: € 10.- per box.
Value of granules used: € 4.- per box.

 

Example PSR for goods of subheading 3923 is:

“Manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed
50 % of the ex-works price of the product”.

As the value of the granules needed for the manufacture of one box (€ 4.-) is less
than 50 % of the value of the final box (€ 10.-), the condition to acquire originating
status is fulfilled.

Therefore, the boxes can be regarded as originating products.

But when the price of the granules soars to (€ 6.-), it’s price becomes more than
50% of the ex-works price of one box (€ 10.-).

In this situation, the condition to acquire originating status is not fulfilled.
The boxes, therefore, cannot be regarded as originating products.

Personally I do not recommend to adopt the VA method because foreseeing the
future price of the material is almost impossible.

If it’s possible, I would recommend adopting the CTC method rather than The
VA method.

Filed Under: Case Study

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Wooden Table with metal frame
  • Laser speed meter
  • Pillowcase with gel
  • Cosmetic set
  • Sponge

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • September 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • December 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019

    Categories

    • Case Study
    • Classification Example
    • complex
    • Court case
    • General
    • GRI
    • HS Classification
    • Link
    • Movie
    • Origin Verification
    • Photo
    • Tariff engineering
    • 未分類

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2025 HS Classification by Precedent